Entries for February 10, 2026

@onusoz · /2026/02/10· 09:36 PM View on

I have sweared at codex 5.3 numerous times today I shouldn't have to insult my agent "stop you **** **** just ***ng reply now" just to make it answer basic questions cc @thsottiaux

@steipete· Feb 10, 2026

codex 5.3 is definitely more trigger-friendly than 5.2. A simple "discuss" no longer works reliably. Changed my habits to use "give me options" to prevent it from running along writing code.

@onusoz · /2026/02/10· 08:33 PM View on

on a brighter note, you can immediately tell a slop PR owing to the guerilla branding, so they should not stop doing it

@onusoz · /2026/02/10· 02:08 PM View on

seeing this evokes visceral disgust and nausea in me, coming from a coworker i think anthropic f'd up bad with this one, inserting claude too visibly into commit messages. noob developers might be happily chirping away adding their slop, but right now many senior developers are trained to hate on claude and slopus, through having to review slop PRs from their coworkers or open source contributors I love opus on openclaw but it's unreliable, and if I see a developer use it seriously on huge features, I immediately dismiss them in my head as not knowing what they are doing

Image hidden